Why do we think giving anonymously is best?

Awhile ago, I went to the grocery store and sitting on top the cans of cat food I buy was a VERY good coupon that someone had clipped and left for the next person who was planning to buy this particular brand of cat food.

They gained nothing with the gesture.  They weren’t going to get the accolade of doing a kind thing.  No one would see me pick it up and use it. No one to thank them for their kindness.

If you do a good thing and no one but you know is it, its an odd feeling.  1st, if you do it truly anonymously – you will not even know whether the generous thing was received or how it was used.  So you have no sense of closure.

You won’t get the sense of validation that comes with gratitude.  You won’t even have a third party openly or tacitly recognizing your generosity.  And humans are heavily dependent on validation.  Its a need.

We all do kind things.  Studies show that we do them to get a sense of validation from our peers, thereby increasing our status in our group (We want validation that we are good people).

Which feels kind of icky because of social norms – but its just reality and doesn’t actually diminish the greatness of doing a good deed.  Because it is a choice.  You don’t have to do the generous thing, but you do it.  And that generous thing can have untold benefits on others.

You want to be considered kind and good and not selfish and mean. Why is that a bad thing?  Is it a bad thing to act the way your want to be?  I want to be runner, I run.  I want to be a doctor, I go to school and become a doctor.  No one tells me that I should do so on the QT.

A truly anonymous gift is often a lauded thing.  Religions tout that an anonymous gift is the only true gift, because when  you remove any self gratification from the equation you have given purely from your heart.

The science is saying that we may not even be capable of giving without the ulterior motive of self defining as a generous person. (ie – getting validation)

I think we need to reconsider this idea that the best gifts are anonymous ones.

Studies show that generosity is contagious – so acting generously in public leads to more people acting generously.  So in a bizarre way – we are acting less generously by keeping it anonymous.

We have so few opportunities to build up our self esteem in positive and real ways.  Is it really a bad thing to want validation for doing a good thing, when in so much of our lives we are pounded with reasons to feel shitty about ourselves?

We live in a world where beauty is an airbrushed illusion that marks everyone with a pre-stamped fail.   We have made music into something that only “professionals” can do – no one else can sing well enough.   Only the tiniest percentage of people who play sports can be good enough to be a professional, so everyone who plays a sport is already a failure.  We are judged daily in our jobs by standards that are subjective on most counts, in areas where our bosses see less than 2% of our actual work.  And those are just a few areas where we struggle to see ourselves positively.

We should embrace those opportunities to feel that we are good, we are kind, we are generous.  We should not feel like we are somehow being less good if we publicly helped someone.

I am left feeling a little bit sad for the person who left me a coupon.  A generous gesture that made me a little bit happy inside. But they didn’t get that boost of happy from my gratitude, from being recognized a generous giver.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Why do we think giving anonymously is best?

  1. I have done both, but feel better when it is anonymous. With that said, by contributing in your name, you do add your voice to the cause, so it may influence others. I once read that someone would donate a good gesture amount in her name, but if they really believed in the cause, she would give a much larger sum anonymously. That approach speaks to me. My dilemma is funds are not infinite and there are a lot of good causes, so I give what I can usually in my name.

    Like

      1. It is like doing a good deed when you know no one is watching. There is a psychic income to volunteering or donating anonymously.

        Before I retired, I used to manage people. When someone was complaining about involving another person on a sales effort, I told him that this person usually helps a team win the sale. So, your chances of winning will be improved. They chose to work with him and were successful. I never said word one to the guy whose participation was questioned. The value is the effort and chance of success improve.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. This is a very interesting take on giving anonymously. I actually wrote something that will be posted Friday about how I overcame the idea that someone needed to thank me for doing something for them. I agree that it is a type of validation (the “thank you”). I’ve also come to learn that it’s unnecessary. Either you give from your heart and you know you did what you wanted to and felt great doing it, or you don’t. It took a while, but I no longer seek validation in this way. Thanks for this. It really made me re-think what I believe.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s