I follow the astronaut Scott Kelly on twitter. While he was in space he did this thing with earth pictures where he likened them to art without identifying the place in the picture. I could never figure out the place – although sometimes I think a cartographer would not have been able to. Because he’d focused on a gorgeous pattern but it didn’t have an easy reference point.
But sometimes he challenged people to identify the place and it did have something you could reference if you knew something about geography. I could NEVER identify it.
EVEN when he said what I was looking at, I was at a loss for several moments because it’s not oriented the way my schooling taught me the earth is oriented.
I think we do a big disservice to kids in constantly orienting maps with the north at the top. It makes us internalize the idea that there is a top to earth. AND THERE ISN’T. No up. No down.
North at the top is just a function of tradition. Yeah, I know the magnetic pole thing – but honestly – in space its just a ball floating in a whole lot of vacuum. And while the planets are on a sort of plane with the sun, AGAIN, is that really related to how the continents are on our sphere?
This is a Dymaxion map designed by Buckminster Fuller. Its designed to give land masses their proper ratios. Notice that Greenland is NOT the same size as Africa. Of course this means none of the water is accurate. Maps, man. Can’t be trusted.
Anyway, I guess I think that if you taught geography as a kind of wild puzzle, without orientation to the north, it would be far more captivating to kids. If you showed them all the crazy ideas that cartographers have come up with to map the world that challenge their ideas of how the world is actually carved up – it might wake them up a bit. They might actually learn where Malaysia is vs Madagascar